Jul
2011
28

Oops. Time For Another Climate Fairy Tale…

James Taylor of Forbes has reported on new NASA data in an article titled “New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hold In Global Warming Alarmism“1. Basically it shows that all the climate models put forth by global warming (aka climate change) alarmists are

Mar
2010
21

20 Ways ObamaCare Will Take Away Our Freedoms

Investor’s Business Daily1 has listed 20 examples of how ObamaCare will take away freedom of choice for Americans. A shortened version: 1. It will cost $750 annually to go without health insurance, even if you are young and healthy. (Section 1501) 2.

Feb
2010
5

One More IPCC “Fact” Gone Wrong — India Quits

Netherlands(dark green below sealevel) As if the IPCC doesn’t have enough egg on its face from basing predictions on manipulated weather data and just lying about the future of glaciers in the Himalayas. Now it’s becoming ever more obvious that nothing the

Dec
2009
17

ClimateGate 2.0: Russian Climate Data Manipulated

I Want To Believe It seems that the “warmers” at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) (University of East Anglia, UEA) aren’t the only ones manipulating climate data to match models and predictions. Now the Russian Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) in Moscow

Dec
2009
15

Climate Change Is Natural: 100 Reasons Why

The European Foundation1 has released a list of 100 reasons why climate change (formerly known as global warming) is natural and not man-made2: It’s unclear exactly what organization this is, and the source article did not provide a link to it, though

Dec
2009
11

Professor Stephen Schneider Responds To ClimateGate Question: By Calling Security

What would one expect from someone with a lot to hide? First ignoring the question, then trying to stop the questioner, and finally calling security.1 See for yourself. This person calling himself a “professor” is from Stanford University. As reported by BigGovernment.com

Nov
2009
29

ClimateGate: Who Cares About Raw Data Anyway?

The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) seems to have destroyed raw weather data that it gathered, only holding onto “value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data“.1 Now isn’t that convenient? The same people who manipulated their data to make their models show results they