Pondering the past, present and future…
James Taylor of Forbes has reported on new NASA data in an article titled “New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hold In Global Warming Alarmism“1. Basically it shows that all the climate models put forth by global warming (aka climate change) alarmists are
Investor’s Business Daily1 has listed 20 examples of how ObamaCare will take away freedom of choice for Americans. A shortened version: 1. It will cost $750 annually to go without health insurance, even if you are young and healthy. (Section 1501) 2.
Netherlands(dark green below sealevel) As if the IPCC doesn’t have enough egg on its face from basing predictions on manipulated weather data and just lying about the future of glaciers in the Himalayas. Now it’s becoming ever more obvious that nothing the
It seems that the IPCC has more egg on its face for the “scientific” conclusions that it claims to present in the name of all “scientists” in the world. This one is about the IPCC statement as to a 90% probability that
I Want To Believe It seems that the “warmers” at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) (University of East Anglia, UEA) aren’t the only ones manipulating climate data to match models and predictions. Now the Russian Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) in Moscow
The European Foundation1 has released a list of 100 reasons why climate change (formerly known as global warming) is natural and not man-made2: It’s unclear exactly what organization this is, and the source article did not provide a link to it, though
What would one expect from someone with a lot to hide? First ignoring the question, then trying to stop the questioner, and finally calling security.1 See for yourself. This person calling himself a “professor” is from Stanford University. As reported by BigGovernment.com
Speaks for itself… pontificusadmin
It has now been 14 days since the ClimateGate matter broke, and major news networks have yet to cover the topic. According to Media Research Center1 ABC, CBS and NBC have yet to mention ClimateGate. Perhaps this is all one needs to
The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) seems to have destroyed raw weather data that it gathered, only holding onto “value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data“.1 Now isn’t that convenient? The same people who manipulated their data to make their models show results they