In yet another act of “unprecedented transparency”1, the Democrats have driven a bill through Congress that has now been signed by Obama (D) to raise the Congressional Credit Card limit to a staggering $14.294 TRILLION without the benefit of CSPAN capturing a
Netherlands(dark green below sealevel) As if the IPCC doesn’t have enough egg on its face from basing predictions on manipulated weather data and just lying about the future of glaciers in the Himalayas. Now it’s becoming ever more obvious that nothing the
Reuters seems to be extending beyond its historical role of adjusting images to suit the story.1 Now the story itself, if not appropriate, will be withdrawn. This happened to a somewhat embarrassing article for Obama, which showed some of the ways in
Spending your way to debt bondage In the sea of self-righteous proclamations by Democrats in Congress to wait for the new Republican Senator from Massachusetts before engaging in further healthcare debate, the same induhviduals have carefully neglected to discuss the real elephant
It seems that the IPCC has more egg on its face for the “scientific” conclusions that it claims to present in the name of all “scientists” in the world. This one is about the IPCC statement as to a 90% probability that
One has to wonder who still buys the tagline from Google to not be evil? It’s not too long ago that Google participated in censorship of the Internet for the Chinese government1, so that the Communist leadership would accept Google. It seems
I Want To Believe It seems that the “warmers” at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) (University of East Anglia, UEA) aren’t the only ones manipulating climate data to match models and predictions. Now the Russian Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) in Moscow
The European Foundation1 has released a list of 100 reasons why climate change (formerly known as global warming) is natural and not man-made2: It’s unclear exactly what organization this is, and the source article did not provide a link to it, though
What would one expect from someone with a lot to hide? First ignoring the question, then trying to stop the questioner, and finally calling security.1 See for yourself. This person calling himself a “professor” is from Stanford University. As reported by BigGovernment.com