CAT | War on Terror
17
InfoWars Identifies Boston Marathon Bombers (OR NOT!) (UPDATED)
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Islamic Extremism, Military, War on Terror
UPDATE3: The Smoking Gun1 has a good article that does a good enough job of convincing us these two guys aren’t it. You judge for yourself.
UPDATE2: According to ABC News2 one of the two previously suspicious appearing individuals identified below has talked to police claiming his innocence.
UPDATE1: According to InfoWars3 the two likely Navy SEALs might be private security from Craft International4.
InfoWars 5 showed its awesomeness yet again by collecting key photographs with basic analysis of the Boston Marathon Bombing. From these pictures we can draw a few conclusions, with the caveat that who knows if the analysis is accurate.
1. Navy SEALs were deployed for security
In the image from InfoWars it appears that two Navy SEALs are providing security near the finish line. The conclusion is based on the BDU-style dress of the individuals, the fact that both are dressed alike, and that one of the persons wears a hat with the SEAL Team logo.
Assuming that the analysis is accurate, it begs the question why SEALs were present. Perhaps they deploy to all similar events. It’s also possible that Boston had some reason to be concerned, perhaps for the same reason that the New York City Marathon was cancelled last year.
2. There Seem To Be Two Obvious Suspects (OR NOT — See the UPDATE above)
Infowars saved everyone some time by finding the two individuals who showed up, looked like they didn’t belong, and one of whom showed up at the finish line with a backpack, and apparently left without it.
It’s probably no coincidence that the backpack, the jacket, and the hat match the FBI description of the individual that they have identified in a store video dropping off the backpack.
What makes the match more likely is the fact that the explosive devices must have been heavy, on the order of 20-30 pounds, due to the pressure cooker body that was used as the vessel, and shrapnel within. This would make a bag with the device appear heavy. As it happens, the two individuals identified by InfoWars carry bags that seem unusually heavy.
In the picture it’s also obvious that the heavy item in the backpack is relatively large, with an odd shape, and is similar to what a pressure cooker body with the handle removed might look like in a backpack of similar size.
Finally, it just happens that the two individuals have middle Eastern features. Coincidence? We will likely know when the FBI makes some announcements.
In the meantime, you are free to draw your own conclusions. Also be sure to check out the InfoWars article which made the disclosures in the first place.6
- The Smoking Gun, “Meet The Two Immigrant Runners Wrongly Fingered As ‘Possible Suspects’ In The Boston Marathon Bombing” ↩
- ABC News, “Teen: I Am Not the Boston Marathon Bomber” ↩
- InfoWars, “Photos: Private military operatives hired to ‘work’ the Boston marathon” ↩
- Craft International website ↩
- InfoWars ↩
- InfoWars Identifies Suspects ↩
© 2013, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
4
TSA Cancer Clusters…
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in 2010 Elections, 2012 Elections, Budget Deficit, DHS, Government, Government Incompetency, Obama Lies, Privacy, Technology, TSA, War on Terror
Everyone surely knows the whole body naked-scanning machines that TSA rushed into service at airports around the country immediately after the mid-term elections. These days they are impossible to miss while traveling.
If one were to wonder if safety was forgotten in the rush to field the machines as quickly as possible, here’s some food for thought:
- Boston TSA employees seem to be experiencing a higher than average rate of skin cancer1
- FDA has not tested the full body scanners for safety2
- NIST has not tested the full body scanners for safety3
- additional action was recommended by the Johns Hopkins University to avoid exceeding the general public dose recommendation of 100 mrem per year4
- the units have areas where beam overshoot will expose bystanders to repeated doses; protective shields were recommended, but seem to not have been implemented5
- the systems were never studied for their cancer inducing properties using standard methods such as mutant mice6
- the often quoted comparison between cosmic background radiation received during flight and the scanning machines is inaccurate, because the energy levels of the radiation are orders of magnitude different7
- the dose estimations are likely to be inaccurate (too low), because the energy levels used concentrate more of the radiation in and near the skin, causing localized doses much higher than the “full body average”8
To be fair, the FDA responded to some of these issues9. Strangely, in the lengthy response nowhere does the FDA state that it studied the systems itself, or that the FDA has determined the systems to be safe. The response made reference to third party safety studies, but not only were these studies not performed on behalf of the FDA on the systems themselves, some of them pointed out issues that had not been addressed by the TSA10.
Further, a key study made by JHU was heavily redacted, making independent verification impossible. Not to mention that the characterization of the third party evaluations was at best questionable, as the FDA claimed NIST had provided “safety data”, when NIST states that it didn’t test the units for safety11.
And last but not least, in a response to the FDA, it seems that the JHU report was inconsistent and in fact implies that the primary radiation was measured in a manner that provided a lower than actual reading12.
Perhaps we should all just drive a car or resign ourselves to the Obama GrabTM until we can all vote out the Dear Leader and his gang that brought us this multi-billion dollar skin cancer experiment.
- BOS TSO cancer + radiation safety and health risk concerns; from the article Cancer Surges In Body Scanner Operators; TSA Launches Cover-Up, referenced from the article ↩
- No reference available, as the FDA has not affirmatively stated that they did or didn’t do so. ↩
- NIST Telecon with Dr. O’Toole; from the article New Documents Prove TSA “Mischaracterized” Safety Aspects Of Full Body Scanners ↩
- JHU presentation; from the article Cancer Surges In Body Scanner Operators; TSA Launches Cover-Up ↩
- NIST Study; from the article Cancer Surges In Body Scanner Operators; TSA Launches Cover-Up ↩
- Letter to John Holdren and Response to John Holdren; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
- 28keV for the units (as noted in Letter to John Holdren), vs. MeV and GeV for cosmic background radiation; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
- Letter to John Holdren; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
- Response to University of California ↩
- e.g. the overscan issue as identified by JHU and NIST ↩
- Response to University of California vs. NIST Telecon with Dr. O’Toole ↩
- Response to John Holdren; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
© 2011, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
9
We Con the World…
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Islamic Extremism, Israel, Video Clips, War on Terror
This requires at least a basic understanding of the issues in the Middle East. With it you are likely to find this funny, regardless of which side you are on.1
We Con the World...
© 2010, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
29
See You in November…
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in 2010 Elections, Broken Campaign Promises, Budget Deficit, Censorship, Constitution, Economy, Government Incompetency, Healthcare, Obama Lies, Unemployment, Video Clips, War on Terror
13
CAIR, HAMAS and the Terror Business
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Islamic Extremism, Israel, War on Terror
It seems that the Council for Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) 1 has been protesting too loudly about being an unindicted co-conspirator of another organization that was found guilty of funneling funds to the HAMAS terror organization.
The US Department of Justice has issued an opinion to a member of Congress regarding the CAIR-HAMAS link, which sums up the problem that CAIR has. According to the DOJ:
“Enclosed are … trial transcripts … contain testimony and other evidence … which demonstrated a relationship among CAIR, individual CAIR founders, and the Palestine Committee. Evidence was also introduced that demonstrated a relationship between the Palestine Committee and HAMAS.” 2
On the other hand, CAIR might not need to protest about being an unindicted co-conspirator for much longer, as according to some reports there is a federal grand jury investigation into the matter.3
[Hat tip to www.investigativereports.org.]
© 2010, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
19
More on CIA’s WOMAP
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Government, Government Incompetency, War on Terror
The unintentional release of a confidential Transportation Security Administration (TSA) document by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “outed” a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) program known as Worldwide Operations Meet and Assist Program (WOMAP) less than two weeks ago.1
WOMAP is an interesting program, as it was not publicly known before the release. For example, Google showed no CIA related hits for WOMAP prior to the unintentional release.
Naturally over the past two weeks a large number of amateur and professional “investigators” have attempted to figure out what WOMAP really means.2 As would be expected in the era of Google searching, without Internet leads little new information has been forthcoming.
- Our original story was published December 8, 2009 ↩
- For example, the article “Did The TSA Compromise An Intelligence Program?” ↩
© 2009, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
16
Muslims of America Training Camps
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Constitution, Islamic Extremism, War on Terror
Muslims of America
The Christian Action Network has published video from a “Muslims of America” training camp in the United States.1 The video from this camp in Hancock, NY shows various types of combat training, and military-like conditioning.
(more…)
© 2009, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
8
TSA Security Breach…
1 Comment | Posted by pontificus in Government Incompetency, War on Terror
What terrorist needs an intelligence gathering operation when it has the Department of Homeland Security doing what it does best: screwing up?
This time DHS decided to post a sensitive document — apparently not classified, but sensitive — online, detailing airport screening procedures, titled “Screening Management Standard Operating Procedures“.1
© 2009, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
19
From Enemy Combatant to American Citizen
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Islamic Extremism, Military, Video Clips, War on Terror
Terrorists — aka Enemy Combatants — in Guantanamo Bay Prison must be humming to the tune of Happy Days.1 That’s because they’ve moved from an enemy combatant held under Geneva conventions up to apparently the same rights as those afforded to American citizens. No longer do they need to worry about a criminal tribunals like others who were similarly situated in former conflicts.2
But what does it really mean to kick out past precedent and start anew?
(more…)
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s 1932 campaign song, among others. ↩
- Is America at war, or not (November 17, 2009) ↩
© 2009 – 2010, Pontificus. All rights reserved.







