CAT | Government
13
Virtual President on Gun Control
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Constitution, Government, Gun Control, Obama Lies
This is the kind of plain speak we all should wish to hear in the “debate” on gun control. Awesome. Too bad nobody has the guts to say what’s right. But fortunately the Virtual President can.1
Virtual President on Gun Control
© 2013, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
30
Houston Police: “You are videotaping me and I want to know who you are”
1 Comment | Posted by pontificus in Constitution, Government, Individuals, The List, Video Clips
This is how the so called law enforcement in the State of Texas works. This officer stated “you are videotaping me and I want to know who you are”, and harassed several individuals for clearly no reason. The same so called officer also grabbed at the video camera, and then claimed that the person video taping had effectively attacked him. Shame on Houston and the state of Texas. If this type of police behavior is allowed to stand, one can only conclude that fascism is alive and well in Texas. 1
Houston Fascism
© 2012, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
7
Viral Video Time — China 2030
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in 2012 Elections, Broken Campaign Promises, Budget Deficit, China, Economy, Government, Government Incompetency, Healthcare, Obama Lies, Unemployment, Video Clips
We can spend our way out of a recession, right? And the deeper it gets, the more we need to spend, right?1 Check out this video from Citizens Against Government Waste2
China 2030
- Sadly, uttered by a Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden, presumably on behalf of his boss, our Dear Leader, the Teleprompter of the United States. ↩
- CAGW.ORG ↩
© 2011, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
4
TSA Cancer Clusters…
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in 2010 Elections, 2012 Elections, Budget Deficit, DHS, Government, Government Incompetency, Obama Lies, Privacy, Technology, TSA, War on Terror
Everyone surely knows the whole body naked-scanning machines that TSA rushed into service at airports around the country immediately after the mid-term elections. These days they are impossible to miss while traveling.
If one were to wonder if safety was forgotten in the rush to field the machines as quickly as possible, here’s some food for thought:
- Boston TSA employees seem to be experiencing a higher than average rate of skin cancer1
- FDA has not tested the full body scanners for safety2
- NIST has not tested the full body scanners for safety3
- additional action was recommended by the Johns Hopkins University to avoid exceeding the general public dose recommendation of 100 mrem per year4
- the units have areas where beam overshoot will expose bystanders to repeated doses; protective shields were recommended, but seem to not have been implemented5
- the systems were never studied for their cancer inducing properties using standard methods such as mutant mice6
- the often quoted comparison between cosmic background radiation received during flight and the scanning machines is inaccurate, because the energy levels of the radiation are orders of magnitude different7
- the dose estimations are likely to be inaccurate (too low), because the energy levels used concentrate more of the radiation in and near the skin, causing localized doses much higher than the “full body average”8
To be fair, the FDA responded to some of these issues9. Strangely, in the lengthy response nowhere does the FDA state that it studied the systems itself, or that the FDA has determined the systems to be safe. The response made reference to third party safety studies, but not only were these studies not performed on behalf of the FDA on the systems themselves, some of them pointed out issues that had not been addressed by the TSA10.
Further, a key study made by JHU was heavily redacted, making independent verification impossible. Not to mention that the characterization of the third party evaluations was at best questionable, as the FDA claimed NIST had provided “safety data”, when NIST states that it didn’t test the units for safety11.
And last but not least, in a response to the FDA, it seems that the JHU report was inconsistent and in fact implies that the primary radiation was measured in a manner that provided a lower than actual reading12.
Perhaps we should all just drive a car or resign ourselves to the Obama GrabTM until we can all vote out the Dear Leader and his gang that brought us this multi-billion dollar skin cancer experiment.
- BOS TSO cancer + radiation safety and health risk concerns; from the article Cancer Surges In Body Scanner Operators; TSA Launches Cover-Up, referenced from the article ↩
- No reference available, as the FDA has not affirmatively stated that they did or didn’t do so. ↩
- NIST Telecon with Dr. O’Toole; from the article New Documents Prove TSA “Mischaracterized” Safety Aspects Of Full Body Scanners ↩
- JHU presentation; from the article Cancer Surges In Body Scanner Operators; TSA Launches Cover-Up ↩
- NIST Study; from the article Cancer Surges In Body Scanner Operators; TSA Launches Cover-Up ↩
- Letter to John Holdren and Response to John Holdren; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
- 28keV for the units (as noted in Letter to John Holdren), vs. MeV and GeV for cosmic background radiation; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
- Letter to John Holdren; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
- Response to University of California ↩
- e.g. the overscan issue as identified by JHU and NIST ↩
- Response to University of California vs. NIST Telecon with Dr. O’Toole ↩
- Response to John Holdren; from the article Scientists’ letter to John Holdren ↩
© 2011, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
23
Obama’s Blackout Problem
1 Comment | Posted by pontificus in 2010 Elections, Censorship, Government, Obama Lies
The corruption case for former Illinois governor Blagojevich is getting more interesting thanks to a PDF file snafu with a defense motion document.
While the judge has ordered certain topics to be kept under seal, it seems that someone chose to redact text 1 by changing the background color of the text, rather than completely erasing the text.
Anyone with some experience with Adobe Acrobat can easily uncover the text, either by cutting and pasting it to another document, or by changing the text color back to what it would normally be.
We have attached a version of the PDF that shows the previously hidden parts of the document. However, we wanted to highlight the parts that had been erased, and instead of changing the document so that the previously hidden text looks normal, we chose to change the text color such that the redacted portion appear white on a black background.2
A revelation in the previously hidden parts of the document is that Blago alleges that he talked to Obama about the Senator seat shopping that landed him in his current predicament, in addition to other corrupt topics. Further, Blago claims that tapes and documents the government doesn’t want to produce to the defense prove his case.
What makes this interesting, is that if the tapes and documents are as damaging as Blago alleges, then Obama might be caught in a lie when he claimed to never have spoken with Blago about such topics.
It would be very interesting indeed, if Blago’s defense will turn into Obama’s version of the blue dress with spots.
© 2010, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
21
20 Ways ObamaCare Will Take Away Our Freedoms
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in 2010 Elections, Broken Campaign Promises, Budget Deficit, Constitution, Government, Healthcare
Investor’s Business Daily1 has listed 20 examples of how ObamaCare will take away freedom of choice for Americans.
A shortened version:
1. It will cost $750 annually to go without health insurance, even if you are young and healthy. (Section 1501)
2. You won’t be able to get health insurance premiums that reflect your (presumably good) lifestyle. (Section 2701).
3. You won’t be able to bargain for lower health insurance costs by agreeing to certain coverage limits. (Section 2711).
4. You won’t be able to save by choosing a policy that doesn’t cover some preventive care. (Section 2712).
5. You won’t be able to offer cheaper insurance to employees by limiting the definition of “children” to something less than 26 years of age. (Section 2714).
6. “You must buy a policy that covers ambulatory patient services, emergency services, hospitalization, maternity and newborn care, mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment; prescription drugs; rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices; laboratory services; preventive and wellness services; chronic disease management; and pediatric services, including oral and vision care.” Regardless of if you need such services or not. (Section 1302).
7. Trying to balance cost of the plan with what percentage the plan covers is limited. (Section 1302 (d) (1) (A))
8. You can’t offer (or buy) policies with higher deductibles than $2,000/$4,000 in exchange for a lower premium. (Section 1302 (c) (2) (A).
9. It will cost an employer with more than 101 employees $750 (or $2,000 to $3,000, depending on what comes out of the closed door meetings) not to offer insurance. (Section 1513).
10. You can’t place more than $2,500 into a Flexible Health Spending Account. (Section 9005 (i)).
11. Physicians will be pressured into limiting the services they use through government monitoring. (Section 3003 (i))
12. A physician won’t be able to own a hospital. (Section 6001 (i) (1) (A))
13. A current physician owner of a hospital won’t be able to expand the hospital, except in limited circumstances, and even then the expansion is very limited. (Section 6001 (i) (1) (B), Section 6601 (i) (3) (E) and Section 6001 (i) (3) (C)).
14. The government will control premium increases. (Section 1003)
15. The government will take $2.3 billion or more every year from the pharmaceutical industry. (Section 1404, and Section 9008 (b))
16. The government will take $2 billion or more every year from medical device makers. (Section 9009 (b), and Section 1405).
17. The government will take $6.7 billion or more every year from insurance companies. (Section 1406, and Section 9010 (b) (1) (A and B))
18. Insurance companies will be limited in what kind of talent they can hire as CEOs, as deferred compensation is limited to $500,000. (Section 9014).
19. You will face a marriage penalty in that you will pay an additional 0.5% tax, or perhaps as much as 3.8%, on income over $250,000 if you file a joint return and $200,000 if you file an individual return. (Section 9015, and Section 1402)
20. Cosmetic surgery, or whatever is defined as such by the government, has a 5% tax on it. (Section 9017).
We won’t even begin with the many Constitutional problems this bill poses. Hope and change, Komrade.
- 20 Ways ObamaCare Will Take Away Our Freedoms; investors.com ↩
© 2010, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
17
2010 US Census — Is a Response Required?
5 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Constitution, Government, Privacy
A recurring topic these days is the 2010 US Census, and what exactly one has to do in response to the tri-fold form currently being mailed to every known “home” in the United States.
Information, misinformation, believes, and rumors abound, and the situation isn’t helped by somewhat misleading information provided by the Census itself. (This will be discussed below.)
It isn’t our intention to interpret law or provide legal advice, but it seems to us that one could take a few different positions on the Census:
- Respond in full, perhaps using the form as requested, or waiting for a door-to-door Census worker to pay a visit;
- Not respond at all, and waiting to see if a door-to-door Census worker appears;
- Respond in full or in part, but making some inaccurate or misleading statements on the form; or
- Respond only to the part that is required for the Census to perform its Constitutional function.
© 2010, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
3
We’re the Government — And You’re Not
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Budget Deficit, Constitution, Economy, Government, Video Clips
“A Guide to Good Citizenship, A Presentation of the U.S. Department of Homeland Propaganda.“1
We're the Government -- And You're Not
© 2010, Pontificus. All rights reserved.
19
More on CIA’s WOMAP
0 Comments | Posted by pontificus in Government, Government Incompetency, War on Terror
The unintentional release of a confidential Transportation Security Administration (TSA) document by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) “outed” a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) program known as Worldwide Operations Meet and Assist Program (WOMAP) less than two weeks ago.1
WOMAP is an interesting program, as it was not publicly known before the release. For example, Google showed no CIA related hits for WOMAP prior to the unintentional release.
Naturally over the past two weeks a large number of amateur and professional “investigators” have attempted to figure out what WOMAP really means.2 As would be expected in the era of Google searching, without Internet leads little new information has been forthcoming.
- Our original story was published December 8, 2009 ↩
- For example, the article “Did The TSA Compromise An Intelligence Program?” ↩
© 2009, Pontificus. All rights reserved.




