<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pontificus &#187; Massachusetts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pontificus.com/tag/massachusetts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pontificus.com</link>
	<description>Pondering the past, present and future...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 07:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Coakley &#8212; A Win Win Fall Gal Strategy for Obama?</title>
		<link>http://pontificus.com/2010/01/coakley-a-win-win-fall-gal-strategy-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://pontificus.com/2010/01/coakley-a-win-win-fall-gal-strategy-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>pontificus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pontificus.com/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Analyzing the stunning victory for the Republicans in Massachusetts, one of the most liberal states in the Union, one comes away with various theories on what might have been playing out behind the scenes. Here&#8217;s one of those theories for your enjoyment. Let&#8217;s pretend that we are a narcissistic1 politician occupying the White House, and [...]<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_" addthis:url='http://pontificus.com/2010/01/coakley-a-win-win-fall-gal-strategy-for-obama/' addthis:title='Coakley &#8212; A Win Win Fall Gal Strategy for Obama? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2009/12/08/2009-12-08_new_blood_primed_to_take_kennedys_senate_seat.html" target="_blank"><img class="  " title="Obama's Fall Gal?" src="http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/12/09/alg_attorney_general_coakley.jpg" alt="" width="200" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Obama&#39;s Fall Gal?</p></div>
<p>Analyzing the stunning victory for the Republicans in Massachusetts, one of the most liberal states in the Union, one comes away with various theories on what might have been playing out behind the scenes. Here&#8217;s one of those theories for your enjoyment.<br />
<span id="more-478"></span><br />
Let&#8217;s pretend that we are a narcissistic<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-478-1' id='fnref-478-1'>1</a></sup> politician occupying the White House, and our only goal is to ensure re-election for a second term. Would it matter if our radical policies pass? Of course not. What matters is that enough people believe that we can bring Hope and Change™ and that problems are caused by the evil opposing party.</p>
<p>In that scenario, how would we approach a key Senate election in a traditionally radically Democratic state?</p>
<p>Easy. Act as if a Coakley victory is a done deal.</p>
<p>If it is, we continue to look like the Messiah™ that some would like us to be, and we can keep our policies going at full speed as before.</p>
<p>If it isn&#8217;t, it&#8217;s a blessing in disguise, as it provides a convenient explanation for the failure of our radical policies for healthcare, the economy, taxes and the environment. This guarantees that there will be a good load of warm steaming Hope and Change™ available when it comes time for our next re-election.</p>
<p>How likely is it that Obama pursued such a cynical<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-478-2' id='fnref-478-2'>2</a></sup> win-win strategy? You decide.</p>
<div class='footnotes'>
<div class='footnotedivider'></div>
<ol>
<li id='fn-478-1'>(an unfair swipe) For the graduates of the Illinois, California and New York public school systems, this means <a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/narcissistic" target="_blank">1: egoism, egocentrism, 2: love of or sexual desire for one&#8217;s own body</a> (/an unfair swipe) <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-478-1'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
<li id='fn-478-2'><a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cynical" target="_blank">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cynical</a> <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-478-2'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
</ol>
</div>
<p style='text-align:left'>&copy; 2010, <a href='http://pontificus.com'>Pontificus</a>. All rights reserved. </p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_" addthis:url='http://pontificus.com/2010/01/coakley-a-win-win-fall-gal-strategy-for-obama/' addthis:title='Coakley &#8212; A Win Win Fall Gal Strategy for Obama? ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pontificus.com/2010/01/coakley-a-win-win-fall-gal-strategy-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

